Gate approvals often rest on optimistic self-reporting. Without independent validation, funders and boards face untested risks. Failures at tender, mobilisation, or transition stages lead to delays, disputes, and damaged credibility.
Gate papers lack independent scrutiny.
Optimistic schedules and budgets pass unchallenged.
Early-stage risks remain hidden until escalation.
Funders face exposure without credible validation.
Boards forced into decisions without neutral evidence.
Project credibility suffers when approvals unravel.
Our Approach – How Rixent closes the gap
Conduct structured gateway reviews aligned with global standards (OGC, IPA, PMI).
Test evidence against independent benchmarks and peer data.
Facilitate validation sessions with boards and funders.
Review governance arrangements for clarity of accountability.
Provide targeted recommendations to close critical gaps before approvals.
Issue assurance packs that withstand scrutiny by regulators and investors.
Deliverables & Outcomes
Assurance packs
Documentation credible to regulators and funders.
Governance validation
Assurance that boards/committees operate effectively.
Risk control testing
Outliers in contractor or supply-chain data detected automatically.